|
|
Post by Starman on Jan 4, 2005 16:39:45 GMT 2
Not me I have a loooooooooooooooong way to go before I hit that old age mark. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by justforfun on Jan 7, 2005 11:12:30 GMT 2
what happened to charly's posts who started this thread in the first place...she was to embarassed and deleted them?
|
|
|
|
Post by charly on Jan 7, 2005 11:30:19 GMT 2
I thought that as chicks rarely come on the site it was useless...you blokes thought I was talking about you and how you feel about turning 40. Not interested in your opinions! They're all perverted and sexist!
|
|
|
|
Post by justforfun on Jan 7, 2005 11:33:33 GMT 2
no, i got what you were talking about!
i personally think it's ok...you know: young chicks and old...
but thinking about it now that i said it, you don't really qualify as a young chick anymore i'd say...hitting the big three zero next year...that's usually where the 'good until date' expires
|
|
|
|
Post by charly on Jan 7, 2005 11:42:14 GMT 2
End of next year actually but I'm alright with that. No husband, no divorces, no kids....but when I'm 30 he'll be....42! and a half!
When I was 'younger' I dated blokes with the same age gap and it was cool. Ahhh older man and all that (don't believe the hype) stuff....but now it's switched to Ohhhh god!!!!! I even call him Dad sometimes.
Um...
|
|
|
|
Post by justforfun on Jan 7, 2005 11:48:15 GMT 2
i bet you guys are getting some mileage out of the 'dad' thing...
i wouldn't spend too much thought on this...as long 'daddy' is fully functional, no problems...you can always upgrade to a newer model at a later point in time (but it's getting tougher every year and with the big three zero coming, i just don't know how easy that will be)
|
|
|
|
Post by charly on Jan 7, 2005 11:56:29 GMT 2
Whatever! You'll be practically dead when I'm 30!
|
|
|
|
Post by justforfun on Jan 7, 2005 12:00:11 GMT 2
your wrong on that one...sorry to break the news to you, but it's like with dogs...their age has to be multiplied by a factor to translate into man years...same with women...the factor for women is 1.8...so you are waaaay in the lead...even your 'daddy' looks green next to you
|
|
|
|
Post by charly on Jan 7, 2005 12:02:28 GMT 2
where the hell did you come up with that bullpoo? askmen.com?
|
|
|
|
Post by justforfun on Jan 7, 2005 12:09:38 GMT 2
i understand that it's easier for you to deal with it by just being in complete denial about the facts
|
|
|
|
Post by charly on Jan 7, 2005 12:20:41 GMT 2
...you wonder why I removed the thread? To avoid man-logic.
|
|
|
|
Post by justforfun on Jan 7, 2005 12:28:21 GMT 2
... They're all perverted and sexist! look who is sexist now! by they way, it's all facts...women's procreational value expires much sooner than men's...i can fax you some aging related medical excerpts if you want |
|
|
|
Post by charly on Jan 7, 2005 14:24:41 GMT 2
Is that all we're useful for? Pro-creation? and what are you doing collecting all these snippets of information!?
(Shall I quote you on your kitchen sink comment? just for sexism sake?)
|
|
|
|
Post by justforfun on Jan 7, 2005 14:39:57 GMT 2
i never blamed others for being sexist and made a sexist remark myself...i just commented on a rumor and felt that if a rumor is very widespread, that there could be a truth to it...as a general rule apllicable to any kind fo rumors
i didn't say women are only useful for pro-creation...i'm sure that there are people who can get some marginal value out of it even after the expiration date.
me just like snippets of information...come in handy many times... ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by charly on Jan 7, 2005 14:47:08 GMT 2
I doubt the sources of all information...I'm doubting a big old one right now!
|
|
