Is he that much of a sleeze??

[anatolian_goddess]

More Evidence Bush Wears A Prompting Earpiece (Below)

(Just because it can not be seen in his ear, It could be in a tooth
implant and use bone conduction to transfer the sound up to the inside
of his ear ?
And of course would be a violation of the Debate rules !)

This violation could be STOPPED by the Kerry people by using one of
these devices (Link Below) -- A "Near Field Receiver" that is similar to
a police scanner monitor except,
That instead of scanning through all the frequencies that can be
received from miles around, This very specialized receiver monitors All
frequencies at one time but just the ones that are originating from
within a few hundred feet.

Anyone reading this that can penetrate the Kerry Campaign shield ! --
Should forward this information to them !!!

See Near Field Receivers here
Optoelectronics, Inc.
Address:http://www.optoelectronics.com/index.htm

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Rense.com
More Evidence Bush Wears
A Prompting Earpiece
RadioFreeUSA.net editor
10-3-4

More Evidence Bush Wears A Prompting Earpiece
Address:http://www.rense.com/general58/prompt.htm

There is one obvious reason that George Bush did so badly in the debate:
he wasn't wearing his usual earpiece connecting him to advisors in a
back room. Prediction: Next time he'll be wearing it and everyone will
be amazed at how much better he does...

An email to Meet The Press asking whether Bush wore an earpiece during
the interview received a lightning quick response from Executive
Producer Betsy Fischer: "The President was not wearing an earpiece at
any time during the interview."

Was Bush wearing an earpiece during today's Meet The Press Interview?
Consider the following excerpt (italics added):

Russert: "In light of not finding the weapons of mass destruction, do
you believe the war in Iraq is a war of choice or a war of necessity?"

President Bush: "I think that's an interesting question. Please
elaborate on that a little bit. A war of choice or a war of necessity?
It's a war of necessity. We-- in my judgment, we had no choice when we
look at the intelligence I looked at that says the man was a threat."
When Bush said "please elaborate on that a little bit" he did not appear
to be asking Russert to elaborate the question. He seemed to be talking
almost to himself. Perhaps he was just momentarily confused by an
unexpected question. However...

If Bush was wearing an earpiece the odd statement makes more sense. An
unseen handler would have had an excellent reason to say "please
elaborate on that" to encourage Bush to give more of an answer than "I
think that's an interesting question." Seen in this light, when Bush
said "please elaborate on that" he mistakenly repeated an instruction
from an unseen handler.

This one small incident alone is (obviously) not proof. But there have
been others. Consider this quote from a December 15th press conference
(italics added):

George Bush: "See, without the tax relief package, there would have been
a deficit, but there wouldn't have been the commiserate -- not
'commiserate' -- the kick to our economy that occurred as a result of
the tax relief."

Again... he could have just said "not commiserate" by mistake. But why?
A less contradictory explanation would be that an unseen handler tried
to correct him and instead of understanding the correction, Bush simply
repeated what he heard in his earpiece.

Early in the Bush administration, commentators poked fun at his frequent
verbal gaffes and his inability to accurately read a teleprompter. Then
he seemed to improve. Perhaps Bush simply learned to speak more
coherently.

But an earpiece connected to a room of unseen handlers also explains
this change.

A few commentators - like Salt Lake City Weekly columnist D.P. Sorensen
- write about the subject as if it's common knowledge (20 Mar 2003
Edition):

[snip]

When the president appears on public occasions, observers have noticed
that he now wears a tiny earpiece. There is speculation that God is
telling Mr. Bush what to say, using a celestial wavelength almost
impossible for evil-doers to intercept. Some observers think the divine
prompting via the earpiece explains the president's propensity for
verbal gaffes, such as his comment in February of 2000 that "there is
madmen in the world, and there are terror."


Does it matter if Bush wears an earpiece? I think it should.

radiofreeusa.net/modules.php?op=modload
&name=News&file=article&sid=2123